The west is playing into Moscow’s hands on Syria
These days, every now and then some of my English- speaking colleagues asks me what Russia will do if the western powers make good on their threats and
strike at Syria? “ My answer is: nothing. Russia does not have to do anything, it can just sit quiet. The situation is advantageous for Moscow. Our leaders will
be only too happy to see the US start a new war it cannot win.
Consider the options. A land invasion is out of the question. Sustained air bombardment risks the loss of pilots, and would therefore be unacceptable for
public in the west. The likeliest avenue is missile strikes; President Bashar al- Assad’ s regime will undoubtedly suffer– but Russia and Iran will be able to
make up for any losses. The allies will give Mr Assad a bloody nose and that is it. Punitive strikes cannot bring about a turning point in the hostilities. Any
substantial change in the correlation of forces on the ground is hardly feasible.
So, morally and psychologically, the Assad regime will score points, at least in the eyes of the developing world – and certainly in those of Russia.
Propaganda is certain to draw parallels with the intervention in Iraq 10 years ago. It is, of course, very easy to picture America as a global bully ever bent
on inventing pretexts for aggression.Iran will be jubilant. Many people in Syria will be inclined to resist a new imperialist crusade.
Upping the ante is advantageous for Moscow. The more the western powers are involved in the conflict, the deeper they are immersed, the more opportunities
emerge for Russia to back the Assad regime as a “ legitimate authority under attack”. Since a land operation can be ruled out, it may appear in the end that not
only has Mr Assad survived but also that Moscow and Tehran won in the global confrontation with the coalition of the west, Turkey and the Arab league.
Western officials imply that a punitive strike is not intended to engineer regime change, nor is it meant to give the opposition an opportunity to deal Mr
Assad a decisive blow. “ We just want to punish the dictator and send him a message: don’t even think of using the chemical weapons again or else…” Well,
suppose he never uses these weapons again. Does this mean that he is bound to lose the war ? Not by a long shot.
Some people seem to believe that Mr Assad, sensing mortal danger to his regime as a result of the strikes that may signal the start of a full- scale western
invasion, will be more amenable to make concessions. According to this view, he would agree to a peace conference and delegate some of his powers to a person
acceptable to the opposition”. In this case, however, there can be no doubt that the rebels, particularly those affiliated with al – Qaeda, would never comply
with this arrangement. “Assad in Damascus ? Never “.
Other analysts have been insisting for months that the only solution is to press Vladimir Putin to convince MrAssad to take a softer line, maybe even to
relinquish powers. It must take an extremely naïve person, however, to believe that the Russian president will ever be ready to do any such thing – or,
even if he were to, that Mr Assad would obediently step down and leave Syria.
At this moment- when the wheel of fortune seems to have turned in Mr Assad’s favor, thanks to assistance from Iran and Hizballah, the Syrian leader is more
likely than ever to believe that it pays to tough it out. Indeed, he is vigorously asserting himself and looks more confident than ever.
As regards what some critics call Mr Putin’s incomprehensible intransigence, the bottom line is this: even if the Assad regime ultimately crumbles, the
Russian president will not be regarded – at least not by domestic public opinion, which is vital for him – as a loser. The official line from the will be: “ We
did our best to help the Syrian people in their struggle against those determined to impose their will and topple a government they disliked. We acted true to
our principles but what can you do against the combined forces of the west, Turkey and Saudi Arabia ? America has shown its true ugly face once more.”
On the contrary, if Mr Putin comes on board now and goes in for some concessions, he looks like a loser since it can be interpreted as backing down under
American pressure. And that really would be absolutely unacceptable to the Russian people.
The writer is a professor at the Institute of World Economy and International Relations in Moscow.